Perbandingan Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Program Sarjana di Australia dan Inggris

Authors

  • Novianita Achmad Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Abdul Haris Panai Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Sitti Roskina Mas Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Zulystiawati Zulystiawati Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55657/rmns.v3i2.158

Keywords:

Higher education, Higher education system, Australia, UK

Abstract

Higher education in Australia and the UK has undergone significant transformation in recent decades, facing challenges of inclusion, representation and efficiency. In Australia, significant changes have occurred in higher education funding, moving to a more flexible and performance-based model, while the UK still struggles with issues of elitism and social inequality. Both countries face challenges in learning mathematics related to infrastructure and understanding complex concepts. However, both offer strong learning experiences that are relevant to industry needs.  This research aims to compare the two countries' higher education systems and analyze the factors that influence the quality of their education, using a descriptive method with diverse data sources such as official reports, academic research and statistical data. The results show that Australia has successfully improved accessibility and equity through diversification and scholarship programs, while the UK still faces major challenges in inclusion and representation. The findings offer important insights into how both countries face the challenges of higher education and seek to develop more inclusive and efficient systems. This research can serve as a reference for governments and educational institutions in developing more effective education policies, capitalizing on Australia's success in diversification and accessibility, and overcoming the obstacles faced by the UK in its efforts to achieve inclusion and social equity in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. Arifin, “Transformisme Pendidikan Di Negara Maju: Inisiatif Filosofis Pengembangan Mutu Di Indonesia,” pp. 7823–7830, 2020.

J. Simpson and C. Smith, “Students, sex work and negotiations of stigma in the UK and Australia,” Sexualities, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 474–490, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1363460720922733.

P. Hurley and N. Van Dyke, “Australian investment in education : Higher education,” Mitchell Institute, Melb., 2020.

Eurydice, The Structure of the European Education Systems 2019/20. 2019.

H. Winarso, Imamuddin Basuni, N. R. Rachman, and Wibisono, “Sistem Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah di 16 Negara,” Biro Perenc. dan Kerjasama Luar Negeri Kementeri. Pendidik. dan Kebud. Tahun 2014, vol. 13, p. 248, 2021.

A. S. Maulida, D. D. Sepkamala, S. Herayani, and W. H. Ikrima, “Analisis Perbandingan Administrasi Publiknegara Inggris Dan Australia,” Pentahelix, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 163, 2023, doi: 10.24853/penta.1.2.163-174.

S. Balok, “Model Budaya Pembentukan Karakter Dalam Sistem Pendidikan Di Jerman, Australia,” Indones. Character J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2023, doi: 10.21512/icj.v1i1.10246.

A. W. Syakhrani, Annisa, Evi, F. Hidayati, and H. Nisa, “Sistem Pendidikan Di Negara Australia,” Adiba J. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 421–428, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://adisampublisher.org/index.php/adiba/article/view/162

S. Ega, “Profil Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dasar Negeri dan Swasta di Kabupaten Sumedang,” J. Manaj. Pendidik. J. Ilm. Adm. Manaj. dan Kepemimp. Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–78, 2023, doi: 10.21831/jump.v4i1.48239.

Arsilawita, Rusdinal, and A. Ananda, “Sistem Pendidikan Inggris Menjawab Tantangan Revolusi Industri 4.0,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1177, 2021.

J. M. Lodge and K. Ashford-Rowe, “Intensive modes of study and the need to focus on the process of learning in Higher Education,” J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract., vol. 21, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.53761/1.21.2.02.

Z. Nuryana, W. Xu, L. Kurniawan, N. Sutanti, S. A. Makruf, and I. Nurcahyati, “Student stress and mental health during online learning: Potential for post-COVID-19 school curriculum development,” Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 14, no. January, p. 100184, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100184.

Soelaiman and T. A. Fauzi, “Sistem Pendidikan di Inggris,” Kant. Atase Pendidikan, Kedutaan Besar Republik Indones. London, pp. 1–154, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://atdikbudlondon.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/buku-sistem-pendidikan-di-inggris-edisi-22.pdf

F. Soelaiman, Sistem Pendidikan di Inggris, no. January. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://atdikbudlondon.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/buku-sistem-pendidikan-di-inggris-edisi-22.pdf

R. Aysi, A. Ananda, and N. Gistituati, “Kurikulum Matematika Sekolah di Australia : Suatu Perbandingan dengan Indonesia,” vol. 08, no. March, pp. 565–576, 2024.

D. S. Ruhansih, “Efektivitas Strategi Bimbingan Teistik Untuk Pengembangan Religiusitas Remaja (Penelitian Kuasi Eksperimen Terhadap Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Nugraha Bandung Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015),” QUANTA J. Kaji. Bimbing. dan Konseling dalam Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.497.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2024

How to Cite

[1]
N. Achmad, A. H. Panai, S. R. Mas, and Z. Zulystiawati, “Perbandingan Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Program Sarjana di Australia dan Inggris”, Res. Math. Nat. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 38–42, Jul. 2024.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.